P.P.TRIKALPUR,WEST PS 444
KETAKEE SINGH
COL 1212316 votes at this polling station
over RAM GOVIND (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KETAKEE SINGH | COL 12 | 316 | 58.63% | |
| 2 | RAM GOVIND | COL 21 | 129 | 23.93% | |
| 3 | MANTI | COL 18 | 33 | 6.12% | |
| 4 | AJAY SHANKAR | COL 27 | 29 | 5.38% | |
| 5 | LAKSHMAN | COL 24 | 7 | 1.30% | |
| 6 | PUNEET | COL 15 | 6 | 1.11% | |
| 7 | SUSHANT | COL 36 | 5 | 0.93% | |
| 8 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | COL 48 | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 9 | PRAMOD PASWAN | COL 42 | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 10 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | COL 30 | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 11 | MAMATA | COL 33 | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 12 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | COL 45 | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | COL 39 | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 539 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 316 | 58.09% | 1 | 82 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 129 | 23.71% | 2 | 276 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 33 | 6.07% | 3 | 91 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 29 | 5.33% | 4 | 57 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 7 | 1.29% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 6 | 1.10% | 6 | 239 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 5 | 0.92% | 7 | 26 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 4 | 0.74% | 8 | 59 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 3 | 0.55% | 10 | 82 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 3 | 0.55% | 9 | 84 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 2 | 0.37% | 11 | 93 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.18% | 12 | 216 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 1 | 0.18% | 13 | 226 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.