P.P.SINGHAI PS 388
KETAKEE SINGH
COL 1212342 votes at this polling station
over RAM GOVIND (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KETAKEE SINGH | COL 12 | 342 | 55.97% | |
| 2 | RAM GOVIND | COL 21 | 101 | 16.53% | |
| 3 | AJAY SHANKAR | COL 27 | 59 | 9.66% | |
| 4 | MANTI | COL 18 | 46 | 7.53% | |
| 5 | LAKSHMAN | COL 24 | 24 | 3.93% | |
| 6 | PUNEET | COL 15 | 23 | 3.76% | |
| 7 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | COL 30 | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | COL 39 | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 9 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | COL 48 | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 10 | PRAMOD PASWAN | COL 42 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | MAMATA | COL 33 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | SUSHANT | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 611 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 342 | 54.63% | 1 | 54 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 101 | 16.13% | 2 | 327 | Weak |
| COL 27 | 59 | 9.42% | 3 | 32 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 46 | 7.35% | 4 | 67 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 24 | 3.83% | 5 | 2 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 23 | 3.67% | 6 | 27 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 5 | 0.80% | 7 | 46 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 5 | 0.80% | 8 | 19 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 4 | 0.64% | 9 | 53 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 240 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 193 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 378 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 387 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.