COMPOSITE VIDYALAY KHANPUR,WEST PS 371
KETAKEE SINGH
BJPBharatiya Janata Party93 votes at this polling station
over PUNEET (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KETAKEE SINGH | BJP | 93 | 40.43% | |
| 2 | PUNEET | INC | 81 | 35.22% | |
| 3 | RAM GOVIND | SP | 47 | 20.43% | |
| 4 | MANTI | BSP | 6 | 2.61% | |
| 5 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | JAP | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 6 | MAMATA | SJSP | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | IND | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | SUSHANT | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | PRAMOD PASWAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | LAKSHMAN | CPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AJAY SHANKAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 230 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 93 | 38.75% | 1 | 42 | Average |
| INC | 81 | 33.75% | 2 | 1 | Average |
| SP | 47 | 19.58% | 3 | 46 | Weak |
| BSP | 6 | 2.50% | 4 | 31 | Poor |
| SJSP | 1 | 0.42% | 7 | 18 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.42% | 6 | 18 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.42% | 5 | 43 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 43 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 46 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 43 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 46 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.