P.P. CHAKAVILIAM PS 325
RAM GOVIND
COL 2121150 votes at this polling station
over KETAKEE SINGH (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAM GOVIND | COL 21 | 150 | 84.27% | |
| 2 | KETAKEE SINGH | COL 12 | 24 | 13.48% | |
| 3 | LAKSHMAN | COL 24 | 3 | 1.69% | |
| 4 | AJAY SHANKAR | COL 27 | 1 | 0.56% | |
| 5 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 6 | MAMATA | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | SUSHANT | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | PRAMOD PASWAN | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | COL 48 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | PUNEET | COL 15 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MANTI | COL 18 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 178 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 150 | 83.80% | 1 | 227 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 24 | 13.41% | 2 | 399 | Weak |
| COL 24 | 3 | 1.68% | 3 | 257 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.56% | 4 | 347 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 367 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 352 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 354 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 355 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 369 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 364 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 368 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 398 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 399 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.