P.P.PITHAICH PS 283
RAM GOVIND
COL 2121313 votes at this polling station
over KETAKEE SINGH (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAM GOVIND | COL 21 | 313 | 50.00% | |
| 2 | KETAKEE SINGH | COL 12 | 278 | 44.41% | |
| 3 | PUNEET | COL 15 | 12 | 1.92% | |
| 4 | MANTI | COL 18 | 10 | 1.60% | |
| 5 | LAKSHMAN | COL 24 | 7 | 1.12% | |
| 6 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | COL 48 | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 7 | MAMATA | COL 33 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | COL 39 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | COL 45 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | PRAMOD PASWAN | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SUSHANT | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AJAY SHANKAR | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 626 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 313 | 49.68% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 278 | 44.13% | 2 | 133 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 12 | 1.90% | 3 | 89 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 10 | 1.59% | 4 | 194 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 7 | 1.11% | 5 | 81 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 3 | 0.48% | 6 | 91 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 184 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 163 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 167 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 337 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 385 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 346 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 355 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.