P.P.RAJPUR,MIDDLE PS 243
KETAKEE SINGH
COL 1212364 votes at this polling station
over RAM GOVIND (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KETAKEE SINGH | COL 12 | 364 | 72.65% | |
| 2 | RAM GOVIND | COL 21 | 89 | 17.76% | |
| 3 | AJAY SHANKAR | COL 27 | 27 | 5.39% | |
| 4 | SUSHANT | COL 36 | 6 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | LAKSHMAN | COL 24 | 4 | 0.80% | |
| 6 | PUNEET | COL 15 | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | MANTI | COL 18 | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | COL 39 | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | MAMATA | COL 33 | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | COL 48 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | PRAMOD PASWAN | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 501 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 364 | 71.65% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 89 | 17.52% | 2 | 355 | Weak |
| COL 27 | 27 | 5.31% | 3 | 60 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 6 | 1.18% | 4 | 18 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 4 | 0.79% | 5 | 194 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 3 | 0.59% | 6 | 317 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 3 | 0.59% | 7 | 326 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 2 | 0.39% | 9 | 79 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 229 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 335 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 338 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.