JR.H.S.BANSDIH NEW BUILDING,MIDDLE PS 211
KETAKEE SINGH
BJPBharatiya Janata Party295 votes at this polling station
over RAM GOVIND (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KETAKEE SINGH | BJP | 295 | 61.72% | |
| 2 | RAM GOVIND | SP | 132 | 27.62% | |
| 3 | MANTI | BSP | 37 | 7.74% | |
| 4 | PUNEET | INC | 5 | 1.05% | |
| 5 | SUSHANT | AAP | 5 | 1.05% | |
| 6 | AJAY SHANKAR | VIP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | LAKSHMAN | CPI | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | PRAMOD PASWAN | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAMATA | SJSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 478 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 295 | 61.33% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| SP | 132 | 27.44% | 2 | 33 | Average |
| BSP | 37 | 7.69% | 3 | 12 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.04% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.04% | 5 | 26 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.42% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 38 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 39 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 39 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 32 | Poor |
| SJSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 33 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.