P.P.DIWAKARPUR PS 203
RAM GOVIND
COL 2121100 votes at this polling station
over KETAKEE SINGH (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAM GOVIND | COL 21 | 100 | 47.62% | |
| 2 | KETAKEE SINGH | COL 12 | 75 | 35.71% | |
| 3 | PUNEET | COL 15 | 8 | 3.81% | |
| 4 | MANTI | COL 18 | 8 | 3.81% | |
| 5 | SUSHANT | COL 36 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 6 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | COL 39 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 7 | PRAMOD PASWAN | COL 42 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 8 | LAKSHMAN | COL 24 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 9 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | COL 48 | 2 | 0.95% | |
| 10 | MAMATA | COL 33 | 1 | 0.48% | |
| 11 | AJAY SHANKAR | COL 27 | 1 | 0.48% | |
| 12 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 210 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 100 | 46.73% | 1 | 329 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 75 | 35.05% | 2 | 373 | Average |
| COL 15 | 8 | 3.74% | 3 | 157 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 8 | 3.74% | 4 | 215 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 6 | 2.80% | 5 | 15 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 3 | 1.40% | 7 | 42 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 3 | 1.40% | 8 | 58 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 3 | 1.40% | 6 | 240 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 2 | 0.93% | 9 | 131 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.47% | 11 | 146 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.47% | 10 | 327 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 320 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 316 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.