JR.H.S.BADASARI JAGIR,SOUTH PS 101
KETAKEE SINGH
BJPBharatiya Janata Party261 votes at this polling station
over MANTI (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KETAKEE SINGH | BJP | 261 | 47.54% | |
| 2 | MANTI | BSP | 180 | 32.79% | |
| 3 | RAM GOVIND | SP | 100 | 18.21% | |
| 4 | VINOD KUMAR VERMA | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 5 | AJAY SHANKAR | VIP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 6 | SWAMI NATH SAHANI | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | PRAMOD PASWAN | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | PUNEET | INC | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | LAKSHMAN | CPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DAYASHANKER VERMA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MAMATA | SJSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHANT | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SANGRAM SINGH TOMAR | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 549 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 261 | 47.28% | 1 | 17 | Strong |
| BSP | 180 | 32.61% | 2 | 1 | Average |
| SP | 100 | 18.12% | 3 | 38 | Weak |
| IND | 5 | 0.91% | 4 | 15 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.36% | 5 | 28 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.18% | 6 | 44 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 31 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 25 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 32 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 41 | Poor |
| SJSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 28 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 362, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.