P.V..RAMPURCHIT, SOUTH PS 221
UPENDRA TIWARI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY307 votes at this polling station
over VIVEK (VIP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UPENDRA TIWARI | BJP | 307 | 58.37% | |
| 2 | VIVEK | VIP | 102 | 19.39% | |
| 3 | SANGRAM SINGH | SP | 89 | 16.92% | |
| 4 | PAWAN PRAKASH | JAP | 6 | 1.14% | |
| 5 | AVALESH | JDU | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | DINESH | RYMD | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 7 | AVADHESH VERMA | BMP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | JANARDAN SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | MANNU | NP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 11 | KAMAL DEV | BSP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 12 | SHAMIM | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | JAINENDRA | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | BHIM | BSJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 526 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 307 | 57.38% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| VIP | 102 | 19.07% | 2 | 1 | Weak |
| SP | 89 | 16.64% | 3 | 37 | Weak |
| IND | 6 | 1.12% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 1.12% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| JDU | 5 | 0.93% | 6 | 3 | Poor |
| RYMD | 4 | 0.75% | 7 | 1 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.56% | 8 | 9 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.37% | 9 | 35 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.37% | 10 | 6 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 38 | Poor |
| BSJP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 30 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 360, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.