P.P.BAHADURPUR PS 171
SANGRAM SINGH
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY216 votes at this polling station
over UPENDRA TIWARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANGRAM SINGH | SP | 216 | 61.19% | |
| 2 | UPENDRA TIWARI | BJP | 83 | 23.51% | |
| 3 | KAMAL DEV | BSP | 47 | 13.31% | |
| 4 | JAINENDRA | INC | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH | IND | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 6 | AVADHESH VERMA | BMP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | MANNU | NP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | VIVEK | VIP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | JANARDAN SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AVALESH | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DINESH | RYMD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | PAWAN PRAKASH | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | BHIM | BSJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHAMIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 353 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 216 | 61.02% | 1 | 23 | Strong |
| BJP | 83 | 23.45% | 2 | 34 | Weak |
| BSP | 47 | 13.28% | 3 | 10 | Weak |
| IND | 2 | 0.56% | 4 | 24 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.56% | 5 | 33 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.28% | 8 | 19 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.28% | 6 | 24 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| RYMD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 26 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 27 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 29 | Poor |
| BSJP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 27 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 360, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.