प्रा0पा0 बस्ती बुजुर्ग प0 PS 84
SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA
COL 2121184 votes at this polling station
over ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA | COL 21 | 184 | 44.34% | |
| 2 | ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI | COL 12 | 96 | 23.13% | |
| 3 | SANJAY YADAV | COL 18 | 95 | 22.89% | |
| 4 | ASHOK | COL 24 | 36 | 8.67% | |
| 5 | SADDAM HUSSAN | COL 42 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 6 | BRIJESH SINGH GAT | COL 15 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | DHARMENDRA | COL 33 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | MOHAN | COL 39 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | MANOJ KUMAR CHAUHAN | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | PRADEEP KUMAR | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHRIRAM CHAUDHARY | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 415 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 184 | 43.40% | 1 | 38 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 96 | 22.64% | 2 | 283 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 95 | 22.41% | 3 | 256 | Weak |
| COL 24 | 36 | 8.49% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 1 | 0.24% | 5 | 270 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.24% | 6 | 96 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 110 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 144 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 210 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 179 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 231 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 359, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.