प्रा0पा0 भारती का पुरवा डूहाबिहारा PS 5
ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI
COL 1212342 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY YADAV (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI | COL 12 | 342 | 68.54% | |
| 2 | SANJAY YADAV | COL 18 | 142 | 28.46% | |
| 3 | SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA | COL 21 | 7 | 1.40% | |
| 4 | BRIJESH SINGH GAT | COL 15 | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 5 | MANOJ KUMAR CHAUHAN | COL 36 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 6 | ASHOK | COL 24 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 7 | SADDAM HUSSAN | COL 42 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | PRADEEP KUMAR | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SHRIRAM CHAUDHARY | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DHARMENDRA | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MOHAN | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 499 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 342 | 67.86% | 1 | 38 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 142 | 28.17% | 2 | 207 | Average |
| COL 21 | 7 | 1.39% | 3 | 287 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 5 | 0.99% | 4 | 99 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.20% | 6 | 93 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.20% | 5 | 190 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 113 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 191 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 174 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 183 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 359, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.