कम्पोजिट विद्यालय अहिरौली तिवारी, पूर्वी PS 244
ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI
COL 1212269 votes at this polling station
over SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI | COL 12 | 269 | 60.45% | |
| 2 | SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA | COL 21 | 90 | 20.22% | |
| 3 | SANJAY YADAV | COL 18 | 78 | 17.53% | |
| 4 | SADDAM HUSSAN | COL 42 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 5 | MANOJ KUMAR CHAUHAN | COL 36 | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 6 | PRADEEP KUMAR | COL 27 | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 7 | SHRIRAM CHAUDHARY | COL 30 | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | BRIJESH SINGH GAT | COL 15 | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | ASHOK | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DHARMENDRA | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MOHAN | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 445 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 269 | 60.04% | 1 | 85 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 90 | 20.09% | 2 | 110 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 78 | 17.41% | 3 | 279 | Weak |
| COL 42 | 3 | 0.67% | 4 | 45 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 2 | 0.45% | 5 | 81 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 106 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 158 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 1 | 0.22% | 6 | 286 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 286 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 271 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 278 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 359, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.