आदर्श इ0का0 सिवानकलां, पश्चिमी PS 173
SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA
COL 2121166 votes at this polling station
over ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA | COL 21 | 166 | 34.80% | |
| 2 | ZIYAUDDIN RIZVI | COL 12 | 161 | 33.75% | |
| 3 | SANJAY YADAV | COL 18 | 141 | 29.56% | |
| 4 | BRIJESH SINGH GAT | COL 15 | 4 | 0.84% | |
| 5 | SHRIRAM CHAUDHARY | COL 30 | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 6 | PRADEEP KUMAR | COL 27 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | MANOJ KUMAR CHAUHAN | COL 36 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | SADDAM HUSSAN | COL 42 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | MOHAN | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DHARMENDRA | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHOK | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 477 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 166 | 34.73% | 1 | 51 | Average |
| COL 12 | 161 | 33.68% | 2 | 204 | Average |
| COL 18 | 141 | 29.50% | 3 | 208 | Average |
| COL 15 | 4 | 0.84% | 4 | 146 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 2 | 0.42% | 5 | 83 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 91 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 140 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 170 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 241 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 235 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 272 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 359, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.