P.P.SAHPUR EAST PART PS 382

AC 356 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

BJPBJP

333 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

172 27.2 pp

votes

over ABBAS ANSARI (SBSP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,070

Total turnout632votes cast at this station

Turnout %59.1% of this booth's roll

Male electors318

Female electors314

Vote share in this booth

of 632 votes counted

BJP 52.7% SBSP 25.5% INC 12.2% BSP 4.4% JKP 3.0% AAP 0.9% CPI 0.6% SUCI 0.3% PP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	ASHOK KUMAR SINGH	BJP	333	52.69%
2	ABBAS ANSARI	SBSP	161	25.47%
3	MADHAVENDRA BAHADUR SINGH	INC	77	12.18%
4	BHIM	BSP	28	4.43%
5	RAMKISHOR	JKP	19	3.01%
6	VIKRAMJIT BHAI	AAP	6	0.95%
7	FAKHRE ALAM	CPI	4	0.63%
8	SHAILENDRA	SUCI	2	0.32%
9	MUNAUVAR	PP	2	0.32%
10	JITENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN	IND	0	0.00%
11	PARMAHANS	IND	0	0.00%
12	MOVIN AHAMAD	IND	0	0.00%
13	RAJPAT CHAUHAN	IND	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 632 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 356

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	333	52.69%	1	59	Strong
SBSP	161	25.47%	2	324	Average
INC	77	12.18%	3	4	Weak
BSP	28	4.43%	4	305	Poor
JKP	19	3.01%	5	95	Poor
AAP	6	0.95%	6	12	Poor
CPI	4	0.63%	7	207	Poor
PP	2	0.32%	8	298	Poor
SUCI	2	0.32%	9	66	Poor
IND	0	0.00%	10	519	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 356, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.