ABDUL LATIF NOMANI INTER COLLEGE BHATKUAPATTI DAYARAI ROOM NO-5 PS 262
ABBAS ANSARI
SBSPSBSP378 votes at this polling station
over MUNAUVAR (PP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABBAS ANSARI | SBSP | 378 | 84.94% | |
| 2 | MUNAUVAR | PP | 22 | 4.94% | |
| 3 | MADHAVENDRA BAHADUR SINGH | INC | 15 | 3.37% | |
| 4 | BHIM | BSP | 13 | 2.92% | |
| 5 | RAMKISHOR | JKP | 9 | 2.02% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR SINGH | BJP | 8 | 1.80% | |
| 7 | FAKHRE ALAM | CPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | VIKRAMJIT BHAI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SHAILENDRA | SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | JITENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | PARMAHANS | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MOVIN AHAMAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAJPAT CHAUHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 445 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBSP | 378 | 84.38% | 1 | 111 | Strong |
| PP | 22 | 4.91% | 2 | 16 | Poor |
| INC | 15 | 3.35% | 3 | 119 | Poor |
| BSP | 13 | 2.90% | 4 | 404 | Poor |
| JKP | 9 | 2.01% | 5 | 308 | Poor |
| BJP | 8 | 1.79% | 6 | 478 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 427 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 502 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 514 | Poor |
| SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 397 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 356, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.