ABDUL LATIF NOMANI INTER COLLEGE BHATKUAPATTI DAYARAI ROOM NO-3 PS 260
ABBAS ANSARI
SBSPSBSP371 votes at this polling station
over MUNAUVAR (PP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABBAS ANSARI | SBSP | 371 | 83.18% | |
| 2 | MUNAUVAR | PP | 21 | 4.71% | |
| 3 | RAMKISHOR | JKP | 21 | 4.71% | |
| 4 | BHIM | BSP | 14 | 3.14% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR SINGH | BJP | 10 | 2.24% | |
| 6 | MADHAVENDRA BAHADUR SINGH | INC | 4 | 0.90% | |
| 7 | JITENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | IND | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | FAKHRE ALAM | CPI | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | VIKRAMJIT BHAI | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | SHAILENDRA | SUCI | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | PARMAHANS | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MOVIN AHAMAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAJPAT CHAUHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 446 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBSP | 371 | 83.18% | 1 | 114 | Strong |
| JKP | 21 | 4.71% | 2 | 70 | Poor |
| PP | 21 | 4.71% | 3 | 20 | Poor |
| BSP | 14 | 3.14% | 4 | 392 | Poor |
| BJP | 10 | 2.24% | 5 | 467 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.90% | 6 | 409 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.45% | 7 | 357 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 214 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 411 | Poor |
| SUCI | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 153 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 356, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.