P.V. GANGAWAL PS 433
NEELAM SONKER
BJPBJP268 votes at this polling station
over BECHAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEELAM SONKER | BJP | 268 | 40.48% | |
| 2 | BECHAI | SP | 264 | 39.88% | |
| 3 | AZAD ARIMARDAN | BSP | 110 | 16.62% | |
| 4 | RAMCHANDAR | INPDNT | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 6 | PUSHPA BHARTIY | INC | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 7 | RIPUSUDAN | JAP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | HARIRAM | AAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | ARVIND | BAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | KARMRAJ | LJP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | RAJNATH DASAI JAISWAR | ASP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 662 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 268 | 40.48% | 1 | 51 | Strong |
| SP | 264 | 39.88% | 2 | 82 | Average |
| BSP | 110 | 16.62% | 3 | 234 | Weak |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.76% | 5 | 157 | Poor |
| INPDNT | 5 | 0.76% | 4 | 87 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.45% | 7 | 82 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.45% | 6 | 298 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 240 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 235 | Poor |
| BAP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 305 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 182 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 351, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.