P.V. SALEMPUR R N -2 PS 367
BECHAI
SPSP286 votes at this polling station
over NEELAM SONKER (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BECHAI | SP | 286 | 47.19% | |
| 2 | NEELAM SONKER | BJP | 217 | 35.81% | |
| 3 | AZAD ARIMARDAN | BSP | 76 | 12.54% | |
| 4 | PUSHPA BHARTIY | INC | 16 | 2.64% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | RIPUSUDAN | JAP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | ARVIND | BAP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | KARMRAJ | LJP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | RAMCHANDAR | INPDNT | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | RAJNATH DASAI JAISWAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | HARIRAM | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 606 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 286 | 47.19% | 1 | 65 | Strong |
| BJP | 217 | 35.81% | 2 | 101 | Average |
| BSP | 76 | 12.54% | 3 | 287 | Weak |
| INC | 16 | 2.64% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.83% | 5 | 147 | Poor |
| BAP | 2 | 0.33% | 6 | 159 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.33% | 7 | 156 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 164 | Poor |
| INPDNT | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 386 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 419 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 421 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 351, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.