izk0fo0 MhgdSFkkSyh d{k la0&1 PS 43
KAMAL KANT
SPS.P208 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA MURARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 208 | 44.07% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 140 | 29.66% | |
| 3 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 53 | 11.23% | |
| 4 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 50 | 10.59% | |
| 5 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 9 | 1.91% | |
| 6 | NOTA | COL 54 | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | VIPENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | GULAB | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA | BMP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 472 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 208 | 44.07% | 1 | 141 | Strong |
| BJP | 140 | 29.66% | 2 | 190 | Average |
| BSP | 53 | 11.23% | 3 | 277 | Weak |
| RUC | 50 | 10.59% | 4 | 65 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 9 | 1.91% | 5 | 62 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.06% | 6 | 177 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 3 | 0.64% | 7 | 80 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.42% | 8 | 256 | Poor |
| PPI | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 155 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 44 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 207 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 202 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.