Ikzk0fo0 fljlky d{k la0&1 PS 423
HUZAIFA AMIR
RUCR.U.C.248 votes at this polling station
over KAMAL KANT (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 248 | 35.48% | |
| 2 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 231 | 33.05% | |
| 3 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 171 | 24.46% | |
| 4 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 38 | 5.44% | |
| 5 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 6 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 54 | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | VIPENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | GULAB | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 699 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUC | 248 | 35.48% | 1 | 2 | Average |
| SP | 231 | 33.05% | 2 | 110 | Average |
| BJP | 171 | 24.46% | 3 | 143 | Weak |
| BSP | 38 | 5.44% | 4 | 308 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.57% | 5 | 278 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 2 | 0.29% | 6 | 230 | Poor |
| SSRD | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 66 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 343 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 181 | Poor |
| PPI | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 268 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 428 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 424 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.