Ikzk0fo0 [kjkVh d{k la0&2 PS 421
KRISHNA MURARI
BJPB.J.P.178 votes at this polling station
over BHUPENDRA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 178 | 49.04% | |
| 2 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 138 | 38.02% | |
| 3 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 39 | 10.74% | |
| 4 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 5 | VIPENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 6 | NOTA | COL 54 | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | JITENDRA | BMP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | GULAB | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 363 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 178 | 49.04% | 1 | 134 | Strong |
| BSP | 138 | 38.02% | 2 | 137 | Average |
| SP | 39 | 10.74% | 3 | 403 | Weak |
| IND | 3 | 0.83% | 4 | 326 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.55% | 5 | 335 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 152 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.28% | 8 | 182 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 1 | 0.28% | 6 | 336 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 431 | Poor |
| PPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 427 | Poor |
| RUC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 430 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 422 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.