Ikzk0fo0 jksoka d{k la0&2 PS 410
HUZAIFA AMIR
RUCR.U.C.116 votes at this polling station
over BHUPENDRA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 116 | 33.72% | |
| 2 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 94 | 27.33% | |
| 3 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 58 | 16.86% | |
| 4 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 53 | 15.41% | |
| 5 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 13 | 3.78% | |
| 6 | GULAB | IND | 3 | 0.87% | |
| 7 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | VIPENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | NOTA | COL 54 | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA | BMP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 12 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 344 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUC | 116 | 33.72% | 1 | 31 | Average |
| BSP | 94 | 27.33% | 2 | 202 | Average |
| BJP | 58 | 16.86% | 3 | 332 | Weak |
| SP | 53 | 15.41% | 4 | 387 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 13 | 3.78% | 5 | 37 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 1.16% | 6 | 276 | Poor |
| PPI | 2 | 0.58% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.58% | 7 | 57 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.29% | 10 | 148 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 1 | 0.29% | 9 | 333 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 418 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 426 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.