m0Ikzk0fo0 Qfjgk[kkl d{k la0&2 PS 370
HUZAIFA AMIR
RUCR.U.C.181 votes at this polling station
over KAMAL KANT (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 181 | 50.28% | |
| 2 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 115 | 31.94% | |
| 3 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 49 | 13.61% | |
| 4 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 6 | 1.67% | |
| 5 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 3 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | VIPENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 54 | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | GULAB | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 360 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUC | 181 | 50.28% | 1 | 9 | Strong |
| SP | 115 | 31.94% | 2 | 294 | Average |
| BJP | 49 | 13.61% | 3 | 351 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 1.67% | 4 | 85 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.83% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.83% | 5 | 426 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 2 | 0.56% | 7 | 217 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.28% | 8 | 333 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 392 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 388 | Poor |
| PPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 403 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 391 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.