Ikzk0fo0 Qfjgk [kkl d{k la0&6 PS 368
HUZAIFA AMIR
RUCR.U.C.236 votes at this polling station
over KAMAL KANT (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 236 | 55.01% | |
| 2 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 124 | 28.90% | |
| 3 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 31 | 7.23% | |
| 4 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 16 | 3.73% | |
| 5 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 16 | 3.73% | |
| 6 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 54 | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | GULAB | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | VIPENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 429 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUC | 236 | 55.01% | 1 | 4 | Strong |
| SP | 124 | 28.90% | 2 | 282 | Average |
| BSP | 31 | 7.23% | 3 | 323 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 16 | 3.73% | 4 | 28 | Poor |
| BJP | 16 | 3.73% | 5 | 417 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.47% | 7 | 325 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 2 | 0.47% | 6 | 216 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 404 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 168 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 387 | Poor |
| PPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 401 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 389 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.