Ikzk0fo0 Qfjgk [kkl d{k la0&4 PS 366
KAMAL KANT
SPS.P146 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA MURARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 146 | 41.48% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 98 | 27.84% | |
| 3 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 70 | 19.89% | |
| 4 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 24 | 6.82% | |
| 5 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 5 | 1.42% | |
| 6 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 4 | 1.14% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 54 | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | VIPENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | GULAB | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 352 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 146 | 41.48% | 1 | 238 | Strong |
| BJP | 98 | 27.84% | 2 | 258 | Average |
| RUC | 70 | 19.89% | 3 | 52 | Weak |
| BSP | 24 | 6.82% | 4 | 347 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 5 | 1.42% | 5 | 112 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.14% | 6 | 166 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 2 | 0.57% | 7 | 215 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.28% | 10 | 171 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.28% | 8 | 403 | Poor |
| PPI | 1 | 0.28% | 9 | 248 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 390 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 386 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.