Ikzk0fo0 /kjuhiqjfo0 d{k la0&1 PS 333
KRISHNA MURARI
BJPB.J.P.299 votes at this polling station
over KAMAL KANT (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 299 | 56.10% | |
| 2 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 154 | 28.89% | |
| 3 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 66 | 12.38% | |
| 4 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 5 | NOTA | COL 54 | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 6 | GULAB | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 7 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 8 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | VIPENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 533 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 299 | 56.10% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| SP | 154 | 28.89% | 2 | 222 | Average |
| BSP | 66 | 12.38% | 3 | 256 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 1.13% | 4 | 82 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.94% | 5 | 210 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 2 | 0.38% | 6 | 208 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 325 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 369 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 364 | Poor |
| PPI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 384 | Poor |
| RUC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 405 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 370 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.