Ikzk0fo0 dejkok d{k la0&1 PS 327
KAMAL KANT
SPS.P148 votes at this polling station
over HUZAIFA AMIR (RUC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 148 | 35.41% | |
| 2 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 142 | 33.97% | |
| 3 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 57 | 13.64% | |
| 4 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 47 | 11.24% | |
| 5 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 15 | 3.59% | |
| 6 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | GULAB | IND | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 9 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | NOTA | COL 54 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | VIPENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 418 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 148 | 35.41% | 1 | 234 | Average |
| RUC | 142 | 33.97% | 2 | 22 | Average |
| BJP | 57 | 13.64% | 3 | 334 | Weak |
| BSP | 47 | 11.24% | 4 | 291 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 15 | 3.59% | 5 | 31 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.20% | 6 | 209 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.72% | 7 | 232 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 318 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 367 | Poor |
| PPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 382 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 365 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 361 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.