Ikzk0fo0 xkslM+h izFke d{k la0&1 PS 300
BHUPENDRA
BSPB.S.P.223 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA MURARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 223 | 62.99% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 59 | 16.67% | |
| 3 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 46 | 12.99% | |
| 4 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 5 | 1.41% | |
| 5 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 4 | 1.13% | |
| 6 | VIPENDRA | IND | 3 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 54 | 3 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 3 | 0.85% | |
| 9 | GULAB | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 10 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 11 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 12 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 13 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 14 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 354 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 223 | 62.99% | 1 | 53 | Strong |
| BJP | 59 | 16.67% | 2 | 329 | Weak |
| SP | 46 | 12.99% | 3 | 398 | Weak |
| IND | 12 | 3.39% | 4 | 28 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.13% | 5 | 158 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 3 | 0.85% | 6 | 112 | Poor |
| RUC | 3 | 0.85% | 7 | 196 | Poor |
| PPI | 2 | 0.56% | 8 | 120 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.28% | 9 | 318 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.28% | 10 | 155 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 350 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 344 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.