tw0gk0Ldwy iqjUnjiqj d{k la0&1 PS 124
KRISHNA MURARI
BJPB.J.P.318 votes at this polling station
over KAMAL KANT (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA MURARI | BJP | 318 | 57.09% | |
| 2 | KAMAL KANT | SP | 166 | 29.80% | |
| 3 | BHUPENDRA | BSP | 53 | 9.52% | |
| 4 | VIPENDRA | IND | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 5 | ZAVED | AIMEI | 5 | 0.90% | |
| 6 | AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | MOHAMMAD NADEEN KHAN | IND | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | NOTA | COL 54 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | MAHENDRA PRASAD BIND | PPI | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | RASHMI VISHWAKARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | LALMAN YADAV | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | HUZAIFA AMIR | RUC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | GULAB | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | JALALUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | JITENDRA | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 557 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 318 | 57.09% | 1 | 23 | Strong |
| SP | 166 | 29.80% | 2 | 204 | Average |
| BSP | 53 | 9.52% | 3 | 278 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.62% | 4 | 58 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 5 | 0.90% | 5 | 107 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.72% | 6 | 131 | Poor |
| PPI | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 177 | Poor |
| COL 54 | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 266 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 256 | Poor |
| RUC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 327 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 256 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 239 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 350, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.