P.V. GADHAVA PS 8
MANOJ YADAV
BJPBJP270 votes at this polling station
over ALAM BADI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANOJ YADAV | BJP | 270 | 47.70% | |
| 2 | ALAM BADI | SP | 189 | 33.39% | |
| 3 | DR.PIYUSH KUMAR SINGH YADAV | BSP | 54 | 9.54% | |
| 4 | ANIL KUMAR YADAV | INC | 20 | 3.53% | |
| 5 | RAJIV YADAV | IND | 7 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | SHAH KAMAR | RJBVP | 6 | 1.06% | |
| 7 | JITENDRA HARI PANDEY | CPI | 6 | 1.06% | |
| 8 | SUSHEEL KUMAR YADAV | RTVP | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 9 | RAJMANI MISHRA | IND | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | AKHTAR ALI | ASP | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 11 | SHAHARYAR MOHAMMAD SADIK | AAP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 12 | Nota | NOTA | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | ABDURRAHMAN ANSARI | AIMIM | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | ARSHAD | BKP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 566 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 270 | 47.70% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| SP | 189 | 33.39% | 2 | 195 | Average |
| BSP | 54 | 9.54% | 3 | 245 | Poor |
| INC | 20 | 3.53% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.77% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| RJBVP | 6 | 1.06% | 7 | 2 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 1.06% | 6 | 31 | Poor |
| RTVP | 4 | 0.71% | 8 | 27 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.53% | 9 | 64 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 10 | 27 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 204 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.18% | 12 | 249 | Poor |
| BKP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 180 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 348, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.