P.V. PARAVEJABAD PS 325
ALAM BADI
SPSP352 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ YADAV (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALAM BADI | SP | 352 | 63.77% | |
| 2 | MANOJ YADAV | BJP | 119 | 21.56% | |
| 3 | DR.PIYUSH KUMAR SINGH YADAV | BSP | 41 | 7.43% | |
| 4 | RAJIV YADAV | IND | 18 | 3.26% | |
| 5 | ANIL KUMAR YADAV | INC | 8 | 1.45% | |
| 6 | JITENDRA HARI PANDEY | CPI | 7 | 1.27% | |
| 7 | SHAH KAMAR | RJBVP | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | SHAHARYAR MOHAMMAD SADIK | AAP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | ARSHAD | BKP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | AKHTAR ALI | ASP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | ABDURRAHMAN ANSARI | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHEEL KUMAR YADAV | RTVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAJMANI MISHRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 552 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 352 | 63.77% | 1 | 46 | Strong |
| BJP | 119 | 21.56% | 2 | 166 | Weak |
| BSP | 41 | 7.43% | 3 | 266 | Poor |
| IND | 18 | 3.26% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.45% | 5 | 92 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.27% | 6 | 28 | Poor |
| RJBVP | 3 | 0.54% | 7 | 48 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.36% | 8 | 59 | Poor |
| BKP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 159 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 273 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 378 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 373 | Poor |
| RTVP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 348, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.