55-P.P. MAFIYA FIROJABAD PS 55
AKHILESH
SPSP387 votes at this polling station
over ABDUSSALAM (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AKHILESH | SP | 387 | 56.58% | |
| 2 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 118 | 17.25% | |
| 3 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 93 | 13.60% | |
| 4 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 80 | 11.70% | |
| 5 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 6 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 7 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | KANHAIYA | AK | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NOTA | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 684 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 387 | 56.58% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| BSP | 118 | 17.25% | 2 | 159 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 93 | 13.60% | 3 | 132 | Weak |
| BJP | 80 | 11.70% | 4 | 226 | Weak |
| RBP | 3 | 0.44% | 5 | 46 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.15% | 6 | 86 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 274 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 279 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 170 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 278 | Poor |
| JRP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 224 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 370 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 172 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.