397-J.H.S. BARAHI PS 397
ARVIND JAISWAL
BJPBJP231 votes at this polling station
over AKHILESH (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 231 | 55.26% | |
| 2 | AKHILESH | SP | 139 | 33.25% | |
| 3 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 19 | 4.55% | |
| 4 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 8 | 1.91% | |
| 5 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 6 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 7 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 8 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 9 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 10 | KANHAIYA | AK | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 11 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 418 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 231 | 55.26% | 1 | 61 | Strong |
| SP | 139 | 33.25% | 2 | 262 | Average |
| BSP | 19 | 4.55% | 3 | 333 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 2.39% | 4 | 12 | Poor |
| JRP | 5 | 1.20% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.96% | 7 | 129 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 4 | 0.96% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.48% | 8 | 73 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.48% | 9 | 139 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 138 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | 11 | 358 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 405 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 403 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.