390-P.V. NETPUR (R.N.-1) PS 390
ABDUSSALAM
BSPBSP273 votes at this polling station
over ARVIND JAISWAL (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 273 | 56.06% | |
| 2 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 93 | 19.10% | |
| 3 | AKHILESH | SP | 87 | 17.86% | |
| 4 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 8 | 1.64% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 6 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 6 | 1.23% | |
| 7 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 5 | 1.03% | |
| 8 | KANHAIYA | AK | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 487 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 273 | 56.06% | 1 | 41 | Strong |
| BJP | 93 | 19.10% | 2 | 205 | Weak |
| SP | 87 | 17.86% | 3 | 336 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 8 | 1.64% | 4 | 263 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.64% | 5 | 23 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.44% | 6 | 51 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.03% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.41% | 8 | 71 | Poor |
| JRP | 2 | 0.41% | 9 | 67 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 254 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 134 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 397 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 401 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.