354-P.V. LAKSHMIPUR PS 354
AKHILESH
SPSP265 votes at this polling station
over ARVIND JAISWAL (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AKHILESH | SP | 265 | 54.30% | |
| 2 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 181 | 37.09% | |
| 3 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 10 | 2.05% | |
| 4 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 9 | 1.84% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.23% | |
| 6 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 9 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | KANHAIYA | AK | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 488 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 265 | 54.30% | 1 | 96 | Strong |
| BJP | 181 | 37.09% | 2 | 109 | Average |
| AIMIM | 10 | 2.05% | 3 | 240 | Poor |
| BSP | 9 | 1.84% | 4 | 387 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.23% | 5 | 76 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.82% | 6 | 125 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.82% | 7 | 119 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.61% | 8 | 77 | Poor |
| JRP | 3 | 0.61% | 9 | 25 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.41% | 10 | 124 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 184 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 371 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 371 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.