316-P.V. KOLHUKHOR (R.N.-1) PS 316
ABDUSSALAM
BSPBSP455 votes at this polling station
over AKHILESH (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 455 | 72.34% | |
| 2 | AKHILESH | SP | 80 | 12.72% | |
| 3 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 67 | 10.65% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 0.95% | |
| 5 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 6 | KANHAIYA | AK | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 9 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 11 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 629 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 455 | 72.34% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| SP | 80 | 12.72% | 2 | 343 | Weak |
| BJP | 67 | 10.65% | 3 | 251 | Weak |
| NOTA | 6 | 0.95% | 4 | 74 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.79% | 5 | 74 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.64% | 6 | 11 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.48% | 7 | 332 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.48% | 8 | 169 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 34 | Poor |
| ISD | 2 | 0.32% | 10 | 35 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 234 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 227 | Poor |
| JRP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 360 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.