310-ANU.P.V. AZAMBADH PS 310
AKHILESH
SPSP368 votes at this polling station
over ABDUSSALAM (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AKHILESH | SP | 368 | 58.60% | |
| 2 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 133 | 21.18% | |
| 3 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 77 | 12.26% | |
| 4 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 8 | 1.27% | |
| 5 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 6 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | KANHAIYA | AK | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 7 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 9 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 10 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 11 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 12 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 13 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 3 | 0.48% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 628 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 368 | 58.60% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| BSP | 133 | 21.18% | 2 | 147 | Weak |
| BJP | 77 | 12.26% | 3 | 235 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 8 | 1.27% | 4 | 256 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.11% | 5 | 33 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.96% | 6 | 49 | Poor |
| AK | 5 | 0.80% | 7 | 7 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.80% | 8 | 41 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.80% | 9 | 102 | Poor |
| RBP | 4 | 0.64% | 11 | 37 | Poor |
| JRP | 4 | 0.64% | 10 | 11 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.48% | 12 | 14 | Poor |
| ISD | 3 | 0.48% | 13 | 16 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.