302-P.V. ATRARI (R.N.-1) PS 302
AKHILESH
SPSP354 votes at this polling station
over ARVIND JAISWAL (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AKHILESH | SP | 354 | 73.14% | |
| 2 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 85 | 17.56% | |
| 3 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 20 | 4.13% | |
| 4 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 11 | 2.27% | |
| 5 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 5 | 1.03% | |
| 6 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 7 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | KANHAIYA | AK | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 484 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 354 | 73.14% | 1 | 38 | Strong |
| BJP | 85 | 17.56% | 2 | 220 | Weak |
| JAP | 20 | 4.13% | 3 | 10 | Poor |
| BSP | 11 | 2.27% | 4 | 374 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 5 | 1.03% | 5 | 303 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.83% | 6 | 114 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.41% | 7 | 241 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 346 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 168 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 115 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 356 | Poor |
| JRP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 355 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 330 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.