3-P.V. NAITHI (R.N.-2) PS 3
ARVIND JAISWAL
BJPBJP212 votes at this polling station
over AKHILESH (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 212 | 41.98% | |
| 2 | AKHILESH | SP | 178 | 35.25% | |
| 3 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 85 | 16.83% | |
| 4 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 13 | 2.57% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 6 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | KANHAIYA | AK | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 505 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 212 | 41.98% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| SP | 178 | 35.25% | 2 | 204 | Average |
| BSP | 85 | 16.83% | 3 | 196 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 13 | 2.57% | 4 | 218 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.19% | 5 | 53 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.79% | 6 | 84 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.40% | 8 | 184 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.40% | 9 | 79 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 16 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 132 | Poor |
| JRP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 191 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 204 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 131 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.