161-P.V. SALARPUR (R.N.-2) PS 161
AKHILESH
SPSP468 votes at this polling station
over ABDUSSALAM (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AKHILESH | SP | 468 | 85.56% | |
| 2 | ABDUSSALAM | BSP | 48 | 8.78% | |
| 3 | SHAH ALAM (GUDDU JAMALI) | AIMIM | 11 | 2.01% | |
| 4 | ARVIND JAISWAL | BJP | 10 | 1.83% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 6 | PHULJHARI DEVI | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 7 | LAL BIHARI MRITAK | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 8 | PARVEEN BANO | INC | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | KANHAIYA | AK | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | NARENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM | ISD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAVISHANKAR BHARAT | JRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RADHESHYAM | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RAMDULARE RAJBHAR | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 547 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 468 | 85.56% | 1 | 11 | Strong |
| BSP | 48 | 8.78% | 2 | 242 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 11 | 2.01% | 3 | 230 | Poor |
| BJP | 10 | 1.83% | 4 | 376 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.73% | 5 | 92 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.73% | 6 | 132 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 299 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 125 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 250 | Poor |
| ISD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 243 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 321 | Poor |
| JRP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 279 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 305 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 346, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.