P.M.V. EKVANDAD PS 75
HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGH PATEL
SPSP98 votes at this polling station
over BANDANA SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGH PATEL | SP | 98 | 41.35% | |
| 2 | BANDANA SINGH | BJP | 94 | 39.66% | |
| 3 | SHANKAR YADAV | BSP | 33 | 13.92% | |
| 4 | RANA KHATOON | INC | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 6 | BABULAL BHARTI | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | SAHTU | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | NESAR | PECP | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | VIRENDRA YADAV | AJP | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | ISHRAK | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | CHANDRIKA | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | PANKAJ MAURYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MUKESH RAI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ABHIMANYU | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | AMIRCHAND RAMLAKHAN YADAV | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 237 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 98 | 41.35% | 1 | 350 | Strong |
| BJP | 94 | 39.66% | 2 | 274 | Average |
| BSP | 33 | 13.92% | 3 | 289 | Weak |
| INC | 4 | 1.69% | 4 | 120 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 3 | 1.27% | 5 | 274 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 1.27% | 6 | 144 | Poor |
| PECP | 1 | 0.42% | 8 | 77 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.42% | 7 | 70 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 239 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 321 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 260 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 238 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 345, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.