P. V. PUNAPAR R.N.-2 PS 243
SHANKAR YADAV
BSPBSP279 votes at this polling station
over BANDANA SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANKAR YADAV | BSP | 279 | 65.49% | |
| 2 | BANDANA SINGH | BJP | 112 | 26.29% | |
| 3 | HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGH PATEL | SP | 25 | 5.87% | |
| 4 | VIRENDRA YADAV | AJP | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 5 | ISHRAK | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 6 | CHANDRIKA | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | BABULAL BHARTI | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | SAHTU | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | ABHIMANYU | BMP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | RANA KHATOON | INC | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | AMIRCHAND RAMLAKHAN YADAV | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NESAR | PECP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | PANKAJ MAURYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | MUKESH RAI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 426 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 279 | 65.49% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| BJP | 112 | 26.29% | 2 | 227 | Average |
| SP | 25 | 5.87% | 3 | 413 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 4 | 0.94% | 4 | 241 | Poor |
| AJP | 3 | 0.70% | 5 | 12 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.23% | 6 | 265 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 349 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 314 | Poor |
| PECP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 323 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 324 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 346 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 319 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 345, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.