P. V. MAJHAUVA PS 194
SHANKAR YADAV
BSPBSP170 votes at this polling station
over BANDANA SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANKAR YADAV | BSP | 170 | 45.70% | |
| 2 | BANDANA SINGH | BJP | 101 | 27.15% | |
| 3 | HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGH PATEL | SP | 96 | 25.81% | |
| 4 | NESAR | PECP | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 5 | RANA KHATOON | INC | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | CHANDRIKA | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | BABULAL BHARTI | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | SAHTU | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | PANKAJ MAURYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MUKESH RAI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIRENDRA YADAV | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ISHRAK | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ABHIMANYU | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | AMIRCHAND RAMLAKHAN YADAV | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 372 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 170 | 45.70% | 1 | 83 | Strong |
| BJP | 101 | 27.15% | 2 | 250 | Average |
| SP | 96 | 25.81% | 3 | 352 | Average |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.54% | 4 | 335 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.27% | 5 | 333 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.27% | 6 | 300 | Poor |
| PECP | 1 | 0.27% | 7 | 102 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 318 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 351 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 298 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 264 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 296 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 345, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.