P. V. MUIYAPAR R.N.-2 PS 113
BANDANA SINGH
BJPBJP123 votes at this polling station
over SHANKAR YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BANDANA SINGH | BJP | 123 | 50.83% | |
| 2 | SHANKAR YADAV | BSP | 55 | 22.73% | |
| 3 | HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGH PATEL | SP | 52 | 21.49% | |
| 4 | RANA KHATOON | INC | 7 | 2.89% | |
| 5 | BABULAL BHARTI | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | AMIRCHAND RAMLAKHAN YADAV | ASP | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | NESAR | PECP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | PANKAJ MAURYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MUKESH RAI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIRENDRA YADAV | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SAHTU | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ISHRAK | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | CHANDRIKA | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | ABHIMANYU | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 242 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 123 | 50.83% | 1 | 207 | Strong |
| BSP | 55 | 22.73% | 2 | 250 | Weak |
| SP | 52 | 21.49% | 3 | 398 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 2.89% | 4 | 34 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.83% | 5 | 322 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.83% | 6 | 197 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.41% | 7 | 102 | Poor |
| PECP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 236 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 275 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 332 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 255 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 213 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 345, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.