P. V. MAUKUTUBPUR R.N.-1 PS 107
SHANKAR YADAV
BSPBSP318 votes at this polling station
over BANDANA SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANKAR YADAV | BSP | 318 | 49.15% | |
| 2 | BANDANA SINGH | BJP | 214 | 33.08% | |
| 3 | HRIDAY NARAYAN SINGH PATEL | SP | 72 | 11.13% | |
| 4 | BABULAL BHARTI | IDPDNT | 14 | 2.16% | |
| 5 | RANA KHATOON | INC | 9 | 1.39% | |
| 6 | ABHIMANYU | BMP | 7 | 1.08% | |
| 7 | MUKESH RAI | AAP | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | SAHTU | IDPDNT | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | ISHRAK | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | CHANDRIKA | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | AMIRCHAND RAMLAKHAN YADAV | ASP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | NESAR | PECP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | PANKAJ MAURYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | VIRENDRA YADAV | AJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 647 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 318 | 49.15% | 1 | 8 | Strong |
| BJP | 214 | 33.08% | 2 | 88 | Average |
| SP | 72 | 11.13% | 3 | 373 | Weak |
| IDPDNT | 19 | 2.94% | 4 | 6 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.39% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| BMP | 7 | 1.08% | 6 | 15 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.77% | 7 | 30 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.31% | 8 | 195 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 100 | Poor |
| PECP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 232 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 207 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 273 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 345, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.