P.V. BUDAVE HISAMUDEENPUR(R.N.-2) PS 84
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP244 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 244 | 44.28% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 219 | 39.75% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 35 | 6.35% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 30 | 5.44% | |
| 5 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 7 | 1.27% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.09% | |
| 7 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 551 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 244 | 44.28% | 1 | 69 | Strong |
| SP | 219 | 39.75% | 2 | 161 | Average |
| BSP | 35 | 6.35% | 3 | 315 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 30 | 5.44% | 4 | 71 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 1.27% | 5 | 21 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.09% | 6 | 68 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.54% | 7 | 182 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.36% | 9 | 151 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.36% | 8 | 75 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 180 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 109 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.18% | 12 | 221 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.