P.V.GOPALPUR (R.N.-3) PS 80
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP162 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 162 | 33.06% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 159 | 32.45% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 142 | 28.98% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 6 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 7 | SUBASH | NP | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 9 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 490 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 162 | 33.06% | 1 | 259 | Average |
| BSP | 159 | 32.45% | 2 | 105 | Average |
| BJP | 142 | 28.98% | 3 | 195 | Average |
| AAP | 5 | 1.02% | 4 | 38 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 5 | 1.02% | 5 | 144 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.02% | 6 | 76 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.82% | 7 | 132 | Poor |
| NP | 4 | 0.82% | 8 | 52 | Poor |
| RJM | 2 | 0.41% | 9 | 103 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 108 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 220 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 280 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.