P.V ARAJI MALAHPURAVA (R.N.1) PS 5
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP190 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 190 | 44.29% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 123 | 28.67% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 77 | 17.95% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 12 | 2.80% | |
| 5 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 7 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.23% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 429 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 190 | 44.29% | 1 | 205 | Strong |
| BSP | 123 | 28.67% | 2 | 152 | Average |
| BJP | 77 | 17.95% | 3 | 280 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 12 | 2.80% | 4 | 95 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.63% | 5 | 32 | Poor |
| VIP | 7 | 1.63% | 6 | 59 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.70% | 8 | 164 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.70% | 7 | 73 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.47% | 10 | 134 | Poor |
| RJM | 2 | 0.47% | 11 | 88 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.47% | 9 | 67 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.23% | 12 | 82 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.